No. 1
Case study · AI Products
2026
No. 1
Case study · AI Products
2026
Case study · AI Products
5 min readThe AI Development Delivery Playbook (Agentic Lane Delivery)
A practical guide to running agentic delivery lanes with complexity-based setup medians, required retainers, and production-focused client delivery.
- agentic development
- product development
- playbook
- Client
- Amir Brooks
- Industry
- AI Products
- Year
- 2026
No. 2
What they needed
2026
No. 2
What they needed
2026
Plate 2
What they needed
What I was asked to fix
Manual workflows and delivery bottlenecks were slowing output and limiting scale.
No. 3
What I built
2026
No. 3
What I built
2026
Plate 3
What I built
Design + build notes
Implemented a focused AI-agent workflow with clear orchestration, quality controls, and production guardrails.
No. 4
Numbers
2026
No. 4
Numbers
2026
Plate 4
The numbers
3Tracked through delivery
- 6
- Playbook Steps
- Brief, research, build, QA, deploy, iterate
- 5 specialists
- Agent Team
- Each handles a domain autonomously
- 337
- Demo Output
- Demos built using this playbook
No. 5
Results
2026
No. 5
Results
2026
Plate 5
Results
Outcomes after shipping
Delivery speed and output quality improved measurably with better consistency and lower manual overhead.
I run focused AI development delivery lanes. They’re not endless projects. They’re not vague “innovation workshops.” They’re scoped, technical, and built to ship cleanly.
This playbook is the system I use to deliver AI products with public setup medians of A$1,000 / A$3,000 / A$5,000 / A$6,000, plus required monthly retainers of A$500–A$1,500 (minimum 3 months). For the terminology shift and positioning update, see Renaming Sprints to Agentic Development.
Who This Is For
- Agencies transitioning into AI delivery
- Founders building MVPs fast
- Teams who need clarity, not chaos
If you want vague scope, this isn’t for you. If you want a clean build, clear boundaries, and accountable delivery, it is.
The Delivery Cycle Philosophy
I treat delivery cycles like product experiments. The goal is speed + clarity, not perfection.
- Ship fast
- Learn fast
- Improve later
That’s the entire mindset.
Phase 1: Pre‑Delivery Cycle (2–3 Days)
The delivery cycle starts before the delivery cycle.
1. Discovery Call (60–90 minutes)
I ask three questions:
- What is the problem?
- Who is the user?
- What does success look like in 14–21 days?
If they can’t answer those, the delivery cycle isn’t ready.
2. Define the “Delivery Cycle Outcome”
I write one sentence:
“At the end of this delivery cycle, the user can ______.”
Everything else is secondary.
3. Scope Lock
I keep the scope ruthless:
- Core workflow only
- No edge-case fantasies
- No unvalidated features
4. Pricing by Lane (Setup + Retainer)
Here’s the public median model I use:
| Delivery Lane | Typical scope window | Setup median (AUD) | Monthly retainer (AUD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lean Build (no DB/auth) | 1-2 weeks | A$1,000 | A$500+ | Landing pages, calculators, lightweight tools |
| Core Product Build (DB/auth) | 2-3 weeks | A$3,000 | A$900+ | Internal tools, portals, operational workflows |
| Commerce Build (payments/ecommerce) | 3-4 weeks | A$5,000 | A$1,200+ | Checkout, billing, fulfillment, revenue systems |
| Multi-Stream Scale | 4+ weeks | A$6,000 | A$1,500+ | Parallel delivery tracks and roadmap ownership |
Setup is priced from complexity and risk, not hours. Every project carries a 3-month retainer minimum so post-launch quality stays stable.
Phase 2: Delivery Cycle Build (Days 1–14/21)
This is where the work happens. I run a daily cadence.
Day 1–2: Architecture + Setup
- Repo setup on GitHub
- Stack decisions (typically Next.js + Convex)
- Data models
- Environment config on Vercel
Day 3–7: Core Workflow Build
- The one thing the user must be able to do
- UI + backend integrated
- No polish until it works end‑to‑end
Day 8–12: UX + Reliability
- Error handling
- Edge cases
- Basic analytics
- Visual polish
Day 13–14/21: Launch Readiness
- Deploy
- Docs / onboarding
- Handoff summary
The Agent Advantage (How I Ship Faster)
I use AI agents to compress the delivery cycle timeline.
- Build agents (powered by Claude from Anthropic and OpenAI's Codex) handle feature implementation
- QA agents scan for bugs
- Writer agents draft docs and onboarding
This means I spend my time directing and reviewing, not grinding. The real-world results of this approach are in I Built 3 AI Apps in 5 Days.
Client Management (How to Avoid Chaos)
1. One Point of Contact
I keep communication tight. One channel. One decision maker.
2. Daily Updates (Asynchronous)
I send a short end‑of‑day update:
- What shipped today
- What’s next
- Any blockers
3. Mid‑Delivery Cycle Review
At the halfway mark, I show real progress and confirm scope. This prevents last‑minute surprises.
4. No “Maybe” Features
If a feature isn’t in scope, it goes to phase two. Scope creep is the delivery cycle killer.
Deliverables (What Clients Actually Get)
By the end of the delivery cycle, clients receive:
- Working product flow
- Live deployment
- Documentation
- Handoff video or summary
Scaling and maintenance continue through the retainer lane (minimum 3 months) instead of an ad-hoc afterthought.
Why the Delivery Cycle Model Works
- Fast feedback loops
- Clear boundaries
- Predictable pricing
- High‑trust delivery
Clients don’t want endless projects. They want outcomes.
Common Mistakes (And How I Avoid Them)
Mistake 1: Vague scope
Fix: write one sentence outcome.
Mistake 2: Over‑promising
Fix: ship one workflow, not five.
Mistake 3: No review checkpoints
Fix: schedule mid‑delivery cycle demo.
Mistake 4: Under‑pricing
Fix: price based on impact, not hours. See the real cost of building AI products for a full breakdown.
Sample Lean Lane Timeline (2 Weeks)
- Day 1: Discovery recap + repo setup
- Day 2: Architecture + data model
- Day 3–5: Core workflow build
- Day 6–7: UX + error handling
- Day 8: Demo + scope confirmation
- Day 9–11: Refinement + polish
- Day 12–13: Docs + deployment
- Day 14: Final handoff
Final Reflection
The delivery cycle model is simple: short timelines, clear outcomes, and disciplined delivery.
In a world where AI is accelerating everything, clients want someone who can turn ambiguity into a shipped product fast.
This playbook is how I do it. The Agentic Development page goes deeper into lane design and scope framing. You can adapt it, adjust it, and run it in your own way. Just keep the core rule: scope tight, ship fast, and learn relentlessly. For the full stack I recommend, see Next.js + Convex: The AI App Stack for 2026, and for cost planning, check out AI Agent Cost Breakdown: Real Numbers.
No. 6
Read another story
2026
No. 6
Read another story
2026
Plate 6
Read another story
Related plates
No. 1
Case study · AI Products
Case Study: 3 AI Agent Apps in One Day
No. 2
Case study · AI Products
AI Agent Cost Breakdown: Real Numbers From the 10K MRR Experiment
Next step
Start one.
I take on two or three projects a month. Tell me what you need.